|
Written by WOTDO
|
|
Friday, 13 February 2009 |
 Senator Jim Webb I'm not really feeling very Valentinish today after seeing the Democrats in the House approve the 1100-page War and Peace sized Economic Recovery Act. There's just not a whole lotta love emanating from me on what should be a TGIF kind of evening. I suppose the little kamikaze sparrow that dive-bombed my windshield this morning to his doom makes me a little sad as well but at least I know he's in a better place. A place that does not involve a Senate that is getting ready to raise its little fists in victory upon their impending agreement with the House on this bill. Interestingly, they could have voted yesterday but methinks they waited until today so that we investors have a weekend to drink ourselves into oblivion and forget about the economic doom that will greet us on Monday morning. Please pass the calcium supplements.But, before taking a drink of my 12 year Jameson, I took the opportunity to once again give my State Representatives the benefit of my coherently formed opinion. Dear Hon. Webb:
I was at the local Border's today and saw that you had a book for sale on the shelf. I picked it up because it looked interesting but then decided against it because why in the hell should I support your personal economy when you are so bent on tearing down mine?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by WOTDO
|
|
Monday, 09 February 2009 |
 Senator Mark Warner Senator Mark Warner issued a fairly prompt response (for a Senator) to my email from February regarding the econominc stimulas plan (see Stimulate This!). It's nice when they respond and hysterical when they send a form letter that doesn't really address your concerns. And it's even more hysterical when you write to them again about a different topic and they send back the exact same form letter. The letter Senator Warner sent to me is viewable below and is also the same letter he sent back in response to Dear Mr. Senator...Since Senaror Warner wrote back (Senator Webb has not issued a peeop yet) here is my response back to him. Odds are 1 - 1 that I will get the exact same repky again. Dear Hon. Warner:
Thank you for responding to my previous email regarding the stimulus plan currently being debated in the Senate. Unfortunately, your form letter in response does nothing to alleviate my concern that you will numbly vote party line and spend MY money in a way that I highly disapprove of.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by WOTDO
|
|
Friday, 06 February 2009 |
 No Ifs, Ands, or..... Butts Smokers, Shisha & SCHIP
Just two weeks into his historic Presidency, President Obama reneged on one of his primary campaign promises (I know - surprise, surprise but call Guinness it has to be a world record) that 95% of Americans would not see even a penny of increases in their taxes. Forgetting this one tiny promise, so tiny and insignificant it could slip under an entry door with weather stripping, Obama signed into legislation the SCHIP bill which gives health coverage for several million additional children, naturally funded by U.S. taxpayers.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by WOTDO
|
|
Wednesday, 04 February 2009 |
 Is That an Eagle? Buzzards, Bailouts and Bonuses Today, President Obama held one of his incessant media-whoring press conferences where he announced yet another fabulous idea - legislation that will limit the pay of executives of firms receiving Federal bailout money to $500,000 per year. While compensation can also include stock, there is a "no sell" clause dictating that the executive must hold onto their stock until the firm pays back the bailout "loan." From what I remember, the bailout monies were not considered re-payable loans so does this mean that executives can never sell their stock? No matter. I wonder where the $500,000 figure came from? Is this enough to pay for the mortgages on however many homes and vacation homes these executives have, the monthly rental fees for their yacht slips, the tuition for their kids private schools, their 5-star dining lifestyle and their Madison Avenue shopping sprees? I know I couldn't live off of $500,000 a year with those budgetary requirements!
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
| Results 65 - 72 of 73 |